Conflict
Which is more important: maintaining peace or maintaining truth? In conflict it may be hard to reconcile these two important Kingdom values. If you want to keep the peace or harmony then truth may be sacrificed. If you keep truth then people may become upset thus disturbing the peace. Which is better? Is there a way to keep both?
God is truth. But from an experiential perspective it seems he doesn’t reveal every truth about us immediately. When we receive the Holy Spirit it’s not like we also receive a scroll full with the “truth” about ourselves, though the truth is now in us. We know generally who we are as sinners but not specifics. He doesn’t even convict us every time we make a mistake. We may go on sinning for decades only for that sin to be revealed later…maybe not at all (generational sin). This can be due to culture, ignorance, bad teaching, but despite the reason it seems that God, though aware of it, does not force truth upon us other than the necessary truth of our sinfulness. He also delays in handing us the truth of himself, though it is fully revealed in Jesus, it is not fully revealed to his body, yet. We know generals, like creator, savior, his love kinda of truth but the specifics are often vague for many years. We may even die not knowing the fullness of who God is. (Is that even possible to know the fullness of the truth of God?)
We do come to know general truths: we are desperate sinners, God is awesome and saves us, etc… maybe I’m thinking too specific. And these truths are necessary for “peace and goodwill toward man”. Without these general truths peace would elude us, so they must be revealed no matter if they disturb a harmony or peace.
God is seeking peace. But is seems he does not always keep the “peace” either. The prophets brought truth in times of sin and rebellion causing major uproars, division among people and even resentment towards God. The purpose was always to give peace, to restore peace between God and man. “I will be your God and you will be my people.” Truth escorted in this peaceful relationship. But the truth of Jesus brings a sword that divides people, family and breaks harmony with others. This truth surely can not be compromised!
I guess I’m leaning toward truth being a conduit for peace. It seems to me love covers a multitude of sin (maintaining peace), but for the thematic ones prophets are sent for correction (restoring peace).
I see this in a Meta sense but how does it work every day? Pointing out every sin, offense, mistake seems to not build peace, but without a prophet to point out themes or sins that are detrimental there will be no true peace. Did Jesus constantly correct the disciples every time their motives were off (he must have known the truth every time) or they made a mistake? Did he ever just keep the peace though a disciple’s joke was not appropriate? He did correct and speak truth into their lives that disturbed the disciples “harmony” but how often, what was it like?
Can you forgive (bringing peace) without confrontation (bringing truth)?
These are some basic thoughts, not well written with many assumptions, but I’m reflecting. What do you think?
God is truth. But from an experiential perspective it seems he doesn’t reveal every truth about us immediately. When we receive the Holy Spirit it’s not like we also receive a scroll full with the “truth” about ourselves, though the truth is now in us. We know generally who we are as sinners but not specifics. He doesn’t even convict us every time we make a mistake. We may go on sinning for decades only for that sin to be revealed later…maybe not at all (generational sin). This can be due to culture, ignorance, bad teaching, but despite the reason it seems that God, though aware of it, does not force truth upon us other than the necessary truth of our sinfulness. He also delays in handing us the truth of himself, though it is fully revealed in Jesus, it is not fully revealed to his body, yet. We know generals, like creator, savior, his love kinda of truth but the specifics are often vague for many years. We may even die not knowing the fullness of who God is. (Is that even possible to know the fullness of the truth of God?)
We do come to know general truths: we are desperate sinners, God is awesome and saves us, etc… maybe I’m thinking too specific. And these truths are necessary for “peace and goodwill toward man”. Without these general truths peace would elude us, so they must be revealed no matter if they disturb a harmony or peace.
God is seeking peace. But is seems he does not always keep the “peace” either. The prophets brought truth in times of sin and rebellion causing major uproars, division among people and even resentment towards God. The purpose was always to give peace, to restore peace between God and man. “I will be your God and you will be my people.” Truth escorted in this peaceful relationship. But the truth of Jesus brings a sword that divides people, family and breaks harmony with others. This truth surely can not be compromised!
I guess I’m leaning toward truth being a conduit for peace. It seems to me love covers a multitude of sin (maintaining peace), but for the thematic ones prophets are sent for correction (restoring peace).
I see this in a Meta sense but how does it work every day? Pointing out every sin, offense, mistake seems to not build peace, but without a prophet to point out themes or sins that are detrimental there will be no true peace. Did Jesus constantly correct the disciples every time their motives were off (he must have known the truth every time) or they made a mistake? Did he ever just keep the peace though a disciple’s joke was not appropriate? He did correct and speak truth into their lives that disturbed the disciples “harmony” but how often, what was it like?
Can you forgive (bringing peace) without confrontation (bringing truth)?
These are some basic thoughts, not well written with many assumptions, but I’m reflecting. What do you think?


